Brief communication: RSNA female gold medal recipients: life, legacy, and intergenerational mentorship.

In recent years, the number of RSNA female gold medal recipients has increased. Also recently, the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in radiology beyond gender has received greater attention. The ACR Pipeline Initiative for the Enrichment of Radiology (PIER) program "began through the Commission for Women and Diversity in hopes of giving underrepresented minorities (URMs) and women an opportunity to explore the radiology specialty and engage in research."1 Consistent with this mission and the mission of Clinical Imaging to "advance knowledge and positively impact patient care and the profession of radiology,"2 the journal is pleased to announce a forthcoming initiative in which PIER program medical students will be paired with senior faculty members and given the opportunity to write a first-authorship publication about the legacies of RSNA Female Gold Medal Recipients. With this form of intergenerational mentorship, scholars will gain a new perspective and guidance as they navigate their early career.

Career Trajectory Factors Affecting Gender Diversity in Academic Radiology Department Chairs: Results of a Survey of SCARD Members.

In this survey of academic radiology department chairs, pathways to first chair appointment were similar between men and women in terms of prior professional accomplishments and chair position preparedness. However, women more commonly perceived that their gender negatively affected their career trajectory, and they more frequently reported experiencing overt discrimination and unconscious bias.

American College of Radiology Paid Family/Medical Leave Policy: A Call to Action for the House of Medicine.

The American College of Radiology (ACR) passed a historic paid family/medical leave (PFML) resolution at its April 2022 meeting, resolving that "diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, medical physics, and nuclear medicine practices, departments and training programs strive to provide 12 weeks of paid family/medical leave in a 12-month period for its attending physicians, medical physicists, and members in training as needed." The purpose of this article is to share this policy beyond radiology so that it may serve as a call to action for other medical specialties. Such a PFML policy (1) supports physician well-being, which in turn supports patient care; (2) is widely needed across American medical specialties; and (3) should not take nearly a decade to achieve, as it did in radiology, especially given increasing physician burnout and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Supported by information on the step-by-step approach used to achieve radiology-specific leave policies and considering current and normative policies at the national level, this article concludes by reviewing specific strategies that could be applied toward achieving a 12-week PFML policy for all medical specialties.

Adding value in the era of COVID-19: Increasing usage of a patient-centered radiology consultation service.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on our department's Radiology Consultation Service (RCS) related to breast imaging, and how utilization of the provided services may have differed as compared to prior to the pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients and health care providers who consulted the RCS, as well as those patients who had a screening mammogram and/or ultrasound between January 1, 2019 and September 1, 2020. Consultations were performed by an RRA, RN and one of 17 breast imaging radiologists assigned to consults on daily. Descriptive statistics were performed to describe the study subject population. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2020 and July 31, 2020, a total of 1623 consultations were performed, in comparison to the control period from the year prior (January 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019), when a total of 1398 consultations were performed, representing a 16% increase in one year. Between March 1, 2020 and June 30, 2020, a total of 679 consultations were performed, in comparison to the control period from the year prior (March 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019), when 583 consultations were performed, representing a 16.5% increase in a four-month period. 350 out of 679 (36.8%) consultations addressed COVID concerns. CONCLUSIONS: While much of radiology experienced an unprecedented decrease in imaging studies during the initial peak of COVID-19 crisis, the RCS at our institution showed a significant increase in services provided, evolving to address pressing concerns related to COVID-19.

Mode of detection matters: Differences in screen-detected versus symptomatic breast cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Although extensive analyses evaluating screening mammography for breast cancer have been published, some utilized databases do not distinguish between modes of detection, which confounds the conclusions made about the impact of screening mammography. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women at our institution with pathologically-proven breast cancer from January 2015 to April 2018 was conducted. Subjects were categorized by their mode of diagnosis: screening or non-screening. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatments were compared between detection methods using Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: 1026 breast cancers were analyzed. 80.8% of screen-detected breast cancers were invasive. Compared to symptomatically detected cancers, screen-detected were smaller (median size 8 mm vs. 15 mm, p < 0.001), less invasive (80.8% vs. 94.3), had a lower pathologic grade (29% grade 3 vs. 45.7%, p < 0.001), a lower clinical stage, and less aggressive histology (51.9% low Ki67 vs. 30.5%, and 88.2% HER2 negative vs. 76.6%, p < 0.001). Screen-detected cancers were less likely to have extramammary disease (13.2% positive lymph nodes vs. 34.0% and 0.4% distant metastases vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001). Women with screen-detected cancers were more likely to undergo conservative treatment (74.8% underwent lumpectomy vs. 59.9%, and 80.0% received no chemotherapy vs. 51.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, while the vast majority of screen-detected cancers were invasive, they were more likely to be smaller, less aggressive, and a lower pathologic grade and clinical stage. Furthermore, women with screen-detected cancers were less likely to have extramammary disease and more likely to undergo conservative treatment.

A lactation credit model to support breastfeeding in radiology: The new gold standard to support "liquid gold".

Breastfeeding has medical and economic benefits and providing an environment supportive of breastfeeding should be a priority in radiology to promote diversity, equity and inclusion. Most breastfeeding radiologists do not meet their breastfeeding goals and inadequate time for pumping is the most commonly cited barrier. The UCSF lactation credit model sets the standard for breastfeeding support in medicine by providing protected time without productivity penalties and it should be adapted and implemented across radiology practices to more fully support breastfeeding radiologists and radiation oncologists.

Breast cancer in women under age 40: A decade of trend analysis at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Women should be evaluated for breast cancer risk by age 30 to assess for screening need. Recent trends in breast cancer in this population may further inform recommendations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze trends over time in the rate of breast cancer, tumor characteristics and treatment in women under age 40. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of women under age 40 at our institution diagnosed with breast cancer from January 2007 to April 2018 was conducted. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Kendell Trend test were calculated. Two-proportion z-tests were used to compare proportions of stage, pathology and treatment between 2007-2013 and 2014-2018. RESULTS: 197 women under age 40 were treated for a new diagnosis of breast cancer at our institution. A higher proportion of women were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma in 2013-2018 (91%) compared to 2007-2012 (78%), p = 0.008. A higher proportion of women were diagnosed with advanced stage disease (stage III-IV) in 2013-2018 (24%) compared to 2007-2012 (2%), p = 0.001. No statistically significant evidence for an increasing trend of overall rate of breast cancer over the last 11 years (p = 0.419) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: While no statistically significant increase in overall rate of breast cancer was noted, an increase in invasive and later staged breast cancers was observed. CLINICAL IMPACT: Rise in more aggressive cancers in a population that is largely not screened may have implications both on the individual young woman's morbidity as well as on a public health level.

Tackling impostor syndrome: A multidisciplinary approach.

What is Imposter Syndrome, whom does it affect, and when, and why is it important to recognize? In this multidisciplinary article, the phenomenon is defined and discussed by a psychiatrist, followed by strategic advice by a radiologist, interventional radiologist and radiation oncologist.